Case study — Travel · 8 min read · 5 questions
Why car rental is such a bad business
The thesis
Car rental is not a badly run industry — it is a structurally unprofitable one, and no operator, conglomerate, automaker, or startup has ever changed that. Every ugly part of the customer experience, from the counter upsell to the phantom damage charge, is the visible end of an unfixable balance sheet.
Avis, Hertz, and Enterprise are not really in the business of renting cars. They are leveraged traders of depreciating assets: they borrow against fleets, earn what rent they can in the narrow window between purchase and resale, and live or die on two numbers — utilization and residual value — set by four cyclical markets none of them control.
And the fleet everyone calls the industry’s weakness is the only thing keeping it alive. It is a liquid, financeable, sellable asset. The asset-light disruptors who proudly avoided it discovered they had swapped a used-car bet for an insurance bet, and had nothing on the balance sheet when the money ran out.
How do you think about this? 5 strategy questions this case raises and does not answer.
Read the comments, or add yours →
The statistics
By the numbers — swipe or use arrows
Figures from company 10-K and 10-Q filings for Avis Budget Group, Hertz Global Holdings, Turo, Getaround and Zoomcar, with used-vehicle data from Manheim and KBB
Key takeaways
The rental car business has margins as low as airlines in good years and as thin as grocery stores in bad ones — and in their best years the companies make more money selling cars than renting them.
Rental companies are closer to hedge funds that specialize in cars: they buy below retail, borrow 70–90% of the purchase price against the fleet, rent in the narrow window before the depreciation curve catches up, then sell. Everything rides on utilization and residual value.
Every major brand was passed around as a strategic asset rather than run as a standalone business — Hertz through NBC, United Airlines and Volvo; Avis through Sheraton, Hunt’s and Tropicana’s parent; National between Boeing and HSBC — and every conglomerate offloaded it within years.
Detroit’s program cars guaranteed buyback prices so rental fleets carried zero depreciation risk, but overproduction — propped up by union Jobs Banks paying laid-off workers 95% of wages to stay home — flooded the used market with identical vehicles and destroyed the residual values the whole system depended on.
The scheme ended in 2008, when fuel prices sent SUV resale values into free fall, Ford lost more than $1 billion on leases, Chrysler shut its leasing division, and GM and Chrysler went bankrupt the following year.
The EV bet repeated the same mistake: Hertz ordered 100,000 Teslas and committed to hundreds of thousands more, then every Tesla price cut destroyed the residual value of the used ones. Hertz booked $245 million and $195 million of losses dumping 20,000 then 100,000 EVs, and Avis lost $518 million doing the same.
Airports are the industry’s only genuinely good venue — captive, price-blind, expense-account customers behind real barriers to entry — but operators hand the airport roughly a tenth of revenue plus minimum annual guarantees. Outside the airport, it is open price war.
Asset-light did not work either: Getaround was delisted from the NYSE within two years of its 2022 IPO, Zoomcar was booted off the Nasdaq within 18 months, and Turo withdrew its own IPO. Turo is closer to an insurer than a rental company, and insurance costs rise with every additional trip.
Hertz ended up with private equity because nobody else wanted it. Ford offloaded it in the early 2000s to the only kind of buyer willing to touch a perennially distressed asset, and the transaction is what finally exposed how unattractive the underlying business was.
The resale market is narrower than the fleet. Demand concentrates on one- to two-year-old cars with 30,000 to 40,000 miles, which dictates how long a rental company can hold a vehicle regardless of whether it is still earning.
Detroit paid people not to work in order to keep building. Jobs Banks paid laid-off workers 95% of wages plus full health benefits to stay home, so factories kept producing cars nobody needed — and those cars flooded the used market that rental residuals depended on.
Growth was the only metric that counted, decades before Silicon Valley made that fashionable. Through the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s the fleets of Hertz, Avis, National and Alamo were overwhelmingly program cars, which made the businesses look stable right up until the guarantees disappeared.
The EV bet was made on a narrative, not a spreadsheet. The industry accepted the early-2020s consensus that electric vehicles would get cheaper, go further and hold value better than gas cars — and every Tesla price cut destroyed the residual value of the ones already on the lot.
Used-car prices are the whole business and they are wildly unstable. The 2021 chip shortage sent them to record highs and the correction through 2024 took them back down, which is the swing a rental company's entire profit sits inside.
Even a perfect vehicle would not fix it. A car that was cheap, reliable, easy to repair and held its value would still leave the operator exposed to a used market it does not control — the asset is the problem, not the model of car.
The urban disruption story is older than the app era. Zipcar was hyped in the late 2000s as the company that would pull rental out of contested airports into neighborhoods, and the airports remained the only genuinely profitable venue in the industry.
Common questions
Why is the car rental business so bad?
Because it is a leveraged bet on used-car prices wearing a service business as a costume. Operators borrow 70–90% of a fleet's cost against the cars themselves, earn what rent they can in the narrow window before depreciation catches up, and then have to sell into a used market they do not control. Margins run as low as airlines in good years and thinner than grocery stores in bad ones.
How do rental car companies make money?
Chiefly on the resale, not the rental. They buy below retail, finance 70–90% of the purchase with debt secured against the fleet, rent the cars during the period when used-market demand is strongest — roughly one to two years and 30,000 to 40,000 miles — and sell them. In their best years the majors make more money selling cars than renting them, which tells you where the business actually is.
What are program cars?
Vehicles sold to rental fleets with a guaranteed manufacturer buyback price, which removed depreciation risk entirely and made the industry look stable through the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Detroit used them to keep factories running — propped up further by Jobs Banks that paid laid-off workers 95% of wages to stay home — and the resulting flood of identical used vehicles destroyed the residual values the whole arrangement depended on.
Why did Hertz lose money on Teslas?
Because it bought into a forecast rather than a price. Hertz ordered 100,000 Teslas, committed to hundreds of thousands more EVs from GM and invested in charging, on the widely shared early-2020s view that electric vehicles would hold value better than gas cars. Every subsequent Tesla price cut cut the resale value of the used ones. Hertz booked around $200 million of losses dumping EVs and Avis roughly half a billion.
Why are rental cars so expensive at airports?
Because the airport is the only genuinely good venue in the industry — captive customers, limited alternatives, and a high proportion of expense-account travelers who do not compare prices. Operators pay the airport roughly a tenth of revenue plus minimum annual guarantees for that position. Outside the airport, it is an open price war between companies with nearly identical fleets.
Did Turo and Getaround disrupt car rental?
No, and the failures were fast. Getaround was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange within two years of its 2022 IPO, Zoomcar was removed from the Nasdaq inside 18 months, and Turo withdrew its own IPO. Going asset-light swapped a used-car bet for an insurance bet — costs rise with every additional trip — and left nothing on the balance sheet to borrow against when the money ran out.
Why do rental car companies keep going bankrupt?
Because the fleet is financed with debt and valued by a market nobody controls. When used-car prices fall, the collateral behind the borrowing falls with them while the debt does not — which is what happened in 2008 when SUV resale values collapsed, Ford lost more than $1 billion on leases, and GM and Chrysler filed the following year. The 2021 chip shortage produced the same volatility in the opposite direction.
Is the rental car fleet an asset or a liability?
Both, and that is the trap. It is the only thing that makes the business financeable — liquid, saleable, and acceptable as collateral — which is why the asset-light disruptors who avoided it had nothing to borrow against. It is also a depreciating inventory priced by four cyclical markets the operator has no influence over. Every strategy in the industry is an attempt to hold one side of that without the other.
Discussion
The case argues that every unpleasant part of renting a car — the counter upsell, the phantom damage charge — is the visible end of an unfixable balance sheet. Where else have you met a customer experience that was really a financing problem in disguise?
No answers yet — be the firstAvis, Hertz and Enterprise live or die on utilization and residual value, both set by cyclical markets none of them control. What are you actually hiring a CEO to do in a business like that?
No answers yet — be the firstThe asset-light disruptors proudly avoided the fleet and discovered they had swapped a used-car bet for a different one. What did they misunderstand about why the fleet existed in the first place?
No answers yet — be the firstIf an industry has never been profitable under any owner, structure or era, what justifies capital continuing to flow into it?
No answers yet — be the firstYou are handed Hertz tomorrow. Is there a version of this business you would genuinely want to run, and what would you have to give up to get there?
No answers yet — be the first
Related case studies
TravelWhy Chinese EVs are so far aheadCheaper, faster and better equipped than anything the West sells, and cheap labor has nothing to do with it.8 min read
TravelWhy almost no luxury carmaker makes moneyToyota sells 10.3 million cars a year. McLaren sells 2,137. Only two exotic makers have made that arithmetic work.12 min read
TravelWhy Asian airlines are so much betterAsian carriers deliver a service Americans barely recognize. American airlines earn more doing far less.8 min read