Case study — Finance · 13 min read · 5 questions
Why buy now, pay later never makes money
Published · Updated
The thesis
Buy now, pay later did not invent anything — short-term unsecured lending is centuries old — but it moved that lending from furniture and appliances to everyday impulse purchases, and it replaced applications and manual underwriting with a button. The demand underneath is real. Only 14% of global retail is online, so e-commerce still has runway; younger consumers distrust banks with cause; credit is slow to build, punishing to miss, and gated on a credit history that only time can fix; and retailers facing rising acquisition costs simply want the sale to close.
The problem is the famous product. Pay in 4 splits a purchase into four interest-free installments, so there is no interest to collect — and it is worse than nothing, because BNPL companies do not fund their own loans. A partner bank does, and the BNPL company is bound to buy that loan back within days above its fair value, plus an origination fee. Affirm books it as loss on loan purchase commitment: $73M growing to $246M, and 27% of operating expenses in 2020.
They keep offering it because the portfolio needs it. A book made only of high-interest loans is a book of subprime borrowers, and prime borrowers do not need BNPL, so the interest-free loan is what buys them. That leaves the gap to be closed elsewhere, and the answer has been to package these consumer loans into securities and sell them while keeping the servicing fee. It is the 2008 structure with a $400 sneaker instead of a $400,000 house — and Affirm concedes borrowers default on BNPL before anything else.
How do you think about this? 5 strategy questions this case raises and does not answer.
Read the comments, or add yours
The statistics
By the numbers — swipe or use arrows
Revenue by stream, gross merchandise volume, active customer and merchant counts, operating losses and loss on loan purchase commitment from Affirm Holdings annual reports and 10-K filings, 2019 through 2022, and from Klarna Bank AB and Afterpay annual reports through 2021; loan origination bank relationships as disclosed by each company; global e-commerce and credit card interest figures from published industry data; acquisition and funding round terms as announced
Key takeaways
BNPL is an old product with a new interface. It is a short-term unsecured personal loan, the kind Americans have used since the 1800s for furniture and sewing machines. What changed is scope and friction: it now covers impulse and splurge purchases, and the historically opaque process of application and manual underwriting has become a few taps at checkout.
Adoption was extraordinarily fast. BNPL was $97 billion, or 2%, of the $4.6 trillion spent on global e-commerce in 2020. By 2021 Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay together claimed over 173 million active users, and four in five Americans have used BNPL — on clothing, groceries, gifts and cleaning supplies.
Three trends made it inevitable. E-commerce still has room, since only 14% of global retail is online. Millennials have passed boomers as the largest adult generation and over 70% of them and zoomers prefer to shop online. And customer acquisition keeps getting more expensive, pushing retailers toward discounts that damage the brand.
The credit system it displaced really is hostile. Card interest at around 19% compounds daily, a missed payment costs $40, and a request to raise your limit triggers a hard inquiry that lowers your score. Length of credit history is a function of time, so a young borrower can do nothing but wait. Globally, consumers paid $121 billion in credit card interest in 2019, and Americans owed close to $1 trillion in card debt by August 2022.
Retailers love it because they carry none of the risk. The retailer is paid in full, immediately, at the moment of checkout. Whether the loan is interest-free or twelve months, and whether the customer repays or vanishes, is entirely the BNPL company's problem.
Which turned retailer exclusivity into an arms race. Retailers partner with one provider at a time: Affirm has Amazon, Peloton and Walmart; Klarna has Lululemon, H&M, Nike, Wayfair, Saks and Sephora; Afterpay has Nordstrom, Adidas, Gap, Tory Burch and Bed Bath & Beyond. Klarna leads with over 400,000 merchants, Affirm has 235,000, Afterpay 98,000.
The three are the same company in different jurisdictions. Identical messaging, identical products, identical claims about proprietary underwriting and low default rates. All funnel users into an app for push-notification retention, all tie identity to a phone number rather than an email, and all offer savings accounts.
Scale differs enormously, though. In 2021 Klarna's users bought over $80B of merchandise against Afterpay's $22B and Affirm's $8B. Klarna operates in 45 countries with 145 million customers; Afterpay in 9 with 16 million; Affirm only in the US and Canada with 7 million. Everyone chases America anyway — it is 25% of global retail.
The market has already repriced them. Afterpay was bought by Square for $29B at the peak in late 2021. Klarna scrapped a $50B IPO and raised instead at $7B — an 80% drop from $45B a year earlier. Affirm is the last standalone public one, which is why its filings are the clearest window into the model.
Two streams carry the business. Merchant fees, a commission of 2 to 5% per sale negotiated per retailer, and interest income. Together they are about 85% of Affirm's revenue. Interest grew from $120M to $530M and merchant fees from $132M to over $450M across four years, while users and volume both rose sevenfold.
The commission is higher when the loan is interest-free — Affirm takes a bigger cut precisely where it earns no interest. Against the 1-3% retailers already pay a card processor, a few more points feels fair for a sale that would not otherwise have closed.
Afterpay proves the model's shape by refusing half of it. It offers only interest-free loans, so it charges higher merchant commission at 4-6% and leans on penalties. Merchant fees are 82% of revenue, near 90% in 2021, quadrupling from $200M to $800M. Late fees are 13% of revenue, doubling from $46M to $90M.
And every one of them loses money. Affirm has lost over a billion dollars in four years, from $127M in 2019 to $866M in 2022. Klarna lost $620M and Afterpay $194M in 2021.
The reason is who actually funds the loan. When you click checkout you are submitting a loan application; the BNPL algorithm underwrites it, but a partner bank issues and funds it. Roughly 80% of Affirm's 2022 loans came from Cross River Bank, a New Jersey community bank. Klarna's US loans come from WebBank in Utah; Afterpay's from National Australia Bank and others.
Then the BNPL company must buy that loan back — above what it is worth. The bank does no underwriting and wants no exposure, so within days the loan is repurchased at face value plus an origination fee. On interest-free loans that price exceeds fair market value, which is a guaranteed loss on the most popular product. Affirm names it loss on loan purchase commitment: $73M in 2019 rising to $246M in 2021, and in 2020 it was 27% of operating expenses on its own.
They keep selling the loss-making loan to buy respectable borrowers. A portfolio of only high-interest loans is a portfolio of subprime borrowers, and prime borrowers — who have credit already — will not take one. Interest-free loans are the bait that balances the book. Two fixes are underway: savings accounts, so deposits fund loans directly (Affirm self-funded 20% of loans in 2022 and cut the loss by $40M), and packaging loans into securities while keeping the servicing fee, now 15% of Affirm's revenue at over $250M. That last one is the 2008 structure at a smaller denomination.
Common questions
Is buy now pay later profitable?
Not for anyone yet. Affirm has lost over a billion dollars in four years, from $127 million in 2019 to $866 million in 2022. Klarna lost $620 million and Afterpay $194 million in 2021. The core reason is that the most popular product — an interest-free split into four payments — earns no interest and actually costs money, because the company buys the loan back from its funding bank at above fair market value plus an origination fee.
How does Affirm make money?
Five ways: merchant fees, a commission of roughly 2 to 5% of each sale negotiated with the retailer; interest income on loans that carry it; virtual card fees, where Affirm takes part of the card processing fee at retailers not formally on its platform; loan sales, packaging loans and selling them to investors; and servicing income, a fee for continuing to administer and collect on loans it has sold. Merchant fees and interest together make up about 85% of revenue. Uniquely among the big three, Affirm charges no late fees at all.
Who actually funds a buy now pay later loan?
A partner bank, not the BNPL company. When you check out, your order doubles as a loan application: the BNPL company's algorithm underwrites and approves it, but the money is issued by a bank it works with. Around 80% of Affirm's 2022 loans were funded by Cross River Bank, a New Jersey community bank; Klarna's US loans come from WebBank in Utah, and Afterpay uses National Australia Bank among others. Within days the BNPL company is contractually bound to purchase that loan back, which is where its economics break.
Why do BNPL companies offer interest-free loans if they lose money on them?
To keep prime borrowers in the loan book. A portfolio made only of high-interest loans is a portfolio of subprime borrowers, which looks high-return on paper and is fragile in a downturn. Borrowers with good credit already have access to cheaper credit and will not take an expensive loan, so the interest-free Pay in 4 is what attracts them. It is a deliberate loss — Affirm books it as loss on loan purchase commitment, which grew from $73 million in 2019 to $246 million in 2021 and reached 27% of operating expenses in 2020.
Is buy now pay later like the 2008 crisis?
The ingredients rhyme rather than match. 2008 combined cheap credit, spending beyond means, overextended subprime borrowers and loose lending standards, and BNPL has versions of all four. The scale is very different — billions of consumer loans against trillions in subprime mortgages — but the direction is uncomfortable: BNPL companies now package consumer loans into securities and sell them to investors while keeping the servicing fee, which is 15% of Affirm's revenue. Affirm itself acknowledges that in a downturn borrowers default on short-term unsecured loans before their mortgages or credit cards.
What is Pay in 4?
The standard BNPL product: the cost of a purchase split into four equal, interest-free payments due every two weeks, with the goods shipped immediately. If you pay each installment on time you pay exactly what you would have paid on a card, spread over six weeks instead of one day. Longer plans, up to 36 months, do carry interest, and the rate reflects how the company's underwriting scores you. The important detail is that Pay in 4 is both the most popular product and the one the companies lose money on.
Does buy now pay later hurt your credit?
It can. These are real loans with real consequences: miss a payment and Klarna and Afterpay charge late fees, the debt can go to collections, and your credit score can fall — Afterpay's late fees alone were $90 million in 2021, 13% of its revenue. Affirm is the exception among the big three in charging no late fees. The subtler risk is behavioural: because the same purchase is presented as a small recurring number rather than its full price, and because loans from multiple providers can be stacked, it is unusually easy to commit more than you would on a single card.
Discussion
BNPL companies lose money on the product customers like most, and offer it to attract borrowers who do not need them. How long can a business subsidise its own respectability?
No answers yet — be the firstThe retailer is paid in full at checkout and carries no default risk. Does that make BNPL a payment method or a wholesale credit transfer with better branding?
No answers yet — be the first80% of Affirm's loans were funded by one community bank. What is the systemic exposure if that relationship changes?
No answers yet — be the firstAffirm charges simple interest and would likely be profitable on compound. Is consumer-friendly pricing a strategy or a subsidy with an expiry date?
No answers yet — be the firstChina put Ant Financial's lending under state control; the US is waiting to see what happens. Which regulator will look right in ten years?
No answers yet — be the first
Related case studies
FinanceHow credit card companies actually make moneyThe swipe fee is not the business. The interest is — and the networks taking the blame were founded by the banks collecting it.15 min read
FinanceHow Western Union makes money from the unbankedIt has more US locations than Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi, Capital One and Bank of America have branches combined.11 min read
FinanceWhy Ukraine's minerals are Iraq's oil all over againAmerica has signed this deal twice before, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and lost both times to the same rival.15 min read