Case study — Food & beverage · 13 min read · 5 questions
Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore
The thesis
On paper ice cream is the easiest business in packaged food. It is frozen, takes few inputs, scales into enormous quantities, and has decades of proven distribution behind it. Switching costs are zero, so a good product can take share in a single trip to the freezer aisle. It is never a question of whether someone eats ice cream, only when.
And every conglomerate that owned it has quit. Unilever assembled the largest ice cream business on earth and grew it 4% in twenty years, blaming the weather every one of them. Nestlé sold Häagen-Dazs, Dreyer's and Drumstick for $4 billion — after margins that had only improved because it cut the pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same. Kroger owned Turkey Hill for forty years, doing $500 million a year, and sold it for $215 million.
Which makes the private equity money pouring into Van Leeuwen, Jeni's and Salt & Straw hard to explain. These are single-product companies with none of the shared manufacturing or scale that got the conglomerates to double digits — and double digits is the ceiling here, not the target. The three New York independents found the only answers that work: fry it and sell it at street fairs, build a brand the incumbents ignore, or skip consumers entirely and sell to 400 restaurants.
How do you think about this? 5 strategy questions this case raises and does not answer.
Read the comments, or add yours →
The statistics
By the numbers — swipe or use arrows
Divisional revenue, operating margins and acquisition prices from Unilever, Nestlé, Froneri, Kroger, Dunkin' Brands and Ben & Jerry's annual reports, filings and press releases for the years shown; franchise costs and median unit revenues from Franchise Disclosure Documents; store-level revenue, seasonal splits and operating margins disclosed on camera by the owners of Sam's Fried Ice Cream, Smoove and il Laboratorio del Gelato
Key takeaways
Ben & Jerry's was never a good business on its own, which is the part the brand story leaves out. As an independent through the 1990s its operating margin ran 7%, 9%, 9%, −3%, 6%, 4%, 4%, 5% and 2% — through the exact decade its cultural profile peaked. Popularity and profitability were never the same problem.
Twenty years later the top line has not moved. $8,422M, $8,127M, $7,623M, $7,045M, $6,947M, $8,284M, $8,386M through 2007, then $7,194M, $7,521M, $8,611M, $8,611M by 2023. Roughly 4% of growth across two decades in a category everybody on earth buys.
Set against the other divisions it is not close. In 2023 Unilever ran 10% in ice cream against 19% in beauty, 20% in personal care, 12% in home care and 18% in nutrition — and in 2022 nutrition hit 32% while ice cream managed 10%. Every euro invested in ice cream was a euro not invested in Dove, Axe, Knorr or Hellmann's.
Management blamed the weather for twenty years. Weak summers, cold seasons, the rising cost of sugar, dairy and cocoa — every year, the same explanations, on a sample size long enough to rule all of them out. Unilever committed to selling the entire ice cream business by 2025 and has struggled to find a buyer.
Its margins did improve — through shrinkflation. Nestlé's ice cream margin ran 11%, 12%, 11%, 12%, 12%, 11%, 12% and then stepped to 14%, 14%, 15%, 15% from 2010. The step change is 2009, the year it cut every Häagen-Dazs pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same price for it.
Then it left. In 2019 Nestlé sold the division to Parisian private equity at a 20% premium for $4 billion, citing a desire to focus on high-growth verticals. Owning the second-best-selling ice cream brand in America did not qualify.
Kroger had owned Turkey Hill for four decades and it was the seventh best-selling brand in the country. The largest supermarket chain in America, with distribution and shelf space nobody else had, decided the ice cream business was not worth keeping either.
The pure-play vehicle was supposed to prove the conglomerates wrong. Froneri does nothing but ice cream and it has grown the top line — $2,631M, $3,973M, $4,240M, $5,074M, $5,292M — entirely through continuous acquisition, with no change in volume.
And the debt eats all of it. Froneri's operating income against its financing costs: $214M against −$193M, $276M against −$383M, $233M against −$392M, $413M against −$448M, $530M against −$586M. It has borrowed so heavily to fund the acquisitions that every dollar of operating profit and more goes to interest. The private equity partner is now looking for its own way out.
The franchise disclosures explain why nobody is opening one. It costs $584,000 to open a Cold Stone and the median store grosses $531,000 a year after royalties — against $1,386,549 at Dairy Queen, $794,620 at Handel's and $462,121 at Baskin Robbins. You spend more than a year's revenue to buy a year's revenue.
Baskin Robbins only survives by riding another brand. Its owner also owns Dunkin', and bundling the scoop shop into the donut chain is the only way it has held US distribution — 2,763 points in 2007 against 2,524 in 2019. It has fewer American shops now than a decade ago.
None of which has stopped private equity. Van Leeuwen has taken $25M, Oberweis $20M, Ample Hills $19M, Jeni's $15M and Salt & Straw $4M to scale production, blanket retailers with pints and open scoop shops — all on the bet that one becomes the Häagen-Dazs of the next generation.
The structural problem is that they cannot even reach the ceiling the conglomerates hit. These are single-product businesses with no shared manufacturing, no cross-sell, no distribution leverage and no adjacent categories — the exact things that got Unilever and Nestlé to double digits in the first place. It has happened before: Ample Hills, Milkmade and Phin & Phebes all imploded under outside capital in the 2010s Brooklyn wave.
The shop is barely the business. It grosses $15,000 a month in summer and as little as $4,000 in the other three seasons — $81,000 a year against $36,000 of rent. The money is at street fairs: over a hundred of them across the Northeast, 50,000 people a night, ten orders a minute, $2,000 in an evening against $500 on the shop's best day. Fairs bring $120,000 a year, for $201,000 combined.
His customers are chefs. He is the exclusive supplier to nearly 400 Manhattan restaurants including Minetta Tavern and Porterhouse, who buy in gallons and turn it into their own desserts sold year-round — which removes the seasonality that defines everybody else in this business. The average wholesale customer spends $550 a month; the average retail customer spends $12 a visit.
Which is why the one number that breaks the pattern is a wholesale one. A restaurant spending $550 a month beats a walk-in spending $12 by a factor of forty-five, all year, without a summer. Jon's moat is not a recipe — it is that he does every job himself, keeps inventory in a shorthand only he can read, and offers free delivery, no minimum order and midnight cut-offs that nobody with a normal org chart could match.
Common questions
Why is Unilever selling its ice cream business?
Because it has not grown in twenty years and it drags on the company's margins. Unilever's ice cream division went from roughly €7.6 billion at the start of the 2000s to €7.9 billion in 2023 — about 4% of growth across two decades — while running a 10% operating margin in 2023 against 19% in beauty, 20% in personal care and 18% in nutrition. Management blamed weak summers and the cost of sugar, dairy and cocoa every year for twenty years. It began reporting ice cream as a standalone division specifically to show investors why it wants out, committed to divesting by 2025, and has struggled to find a buyer for the largest ice cream business in the world.
Is an ice cream shop profitable?
Marginally, and only if you solve seasonality. The three New York independents in this episode run 9% to 13% operating margins. Smoove grosses $500,000 a year at 13%, swinging between 10% in winter and 15% in summer. il Laboratorio del Gelato runs 10% on wholesale and 9% on retail. Sam's Fried Ice Cream grosses $81,000 from the shop and $120,000 from street fairs. For comparison, other independent food concepts covered on this channel run 20% to 40%. The franchise route is worse: opening a Cold Stone costs $584,000 and the median store grosses $531,000 a year.
Did Häagen-Dazs shrink its pints?
Yes, in 2009, from 16 ounces to 14 at the same price. It is visible in Nestlé's accounts: the ice cream division's operating margin sat at 11–12% through the 2000s and stepped up to 14–15% from 2010 onwards. Revenue was falling the whole time — from a 2007 peak of $8,724 million down to $3,289 million by 2019 — so the margin improvement came from selling less product for the same money rather than from selling more.
Who owns Ben & Jerry's and Häagen-Dazs?
Unilever bought Ben & Jerry's in 2000 and still owns it, though it has committed to divesting its entire ice cream business. Häagen-Dazs was bought by Nestlé, which sold its ice cream division — Häagen-Dazs, Dreyer's, Drumstick and Dibs — to Froneri, a joint venture with Paris-based private equity, for $4 billion in 2019. Froneri now has that portfolio plus its own acquisitions, tops out at a 10% operating margin, and pays more in interest on its acquisition debt than it earns in operating income.
Why is private equity investing in Van Leeuwen and Jeni's?
On the bet that one becomes the Häagen-Dazs of the next generation. Van Leeuwen has taken $25 million, Oberweis $20 million, Ample Hills $19 million, Jeni's $15 million and Salt & Straw $4 million to scale production, open shops and get pints into retailers. The problem is structural: these are single-product companies with none of the shared manufacturing, unified distribution, cross-sell or adjacent categories that got Unilever and Nestlé to double-digit margins — and double digits is the ceiling in this category, not the target. It has failed before: Ample Hills, Milkmade and Phin & Phebes all imploded under outside capital in the 2010s.
Why did Kroger sell Turkey Hill?
For the same reason as everyone else — it decided the category was not worth the shelf it occupied. Kroger had owned Turkey Hill for four decades, it was the seventh best-selling ice cream brand in the United States, and it grossed $500 million a year. Kroger sold it to private equity in 2019 for $215 million, less than half its annual revenue. When the largest supermarket chain in America cannot make ice cream worth owning, the distribution advantage everyone assumes exists is not there.
How does il Laboratorio del Gelato make money?
By skipping consumers. Jon is the exclusive supplier to nearly 400 Manhattan restaurants, who buy in gallons and turn the gelato into their own desserts sold all year — which removes the seasonality that defines the rest of the industry. Wholesale grosses $190,000 a month, $2.3 million a year, against $480,000 from the storefront. The average wholesale customer spends $550 a month; the average retail customer spends $12 a visit. He tested a retail-only second location and closed it after it grossed $324,000 a year, and he refuses supermarkets and licensing entirely because he cannot control the freezer temperature once the product leaves his hands.
Why is ice cream so seasonal, and can that be fixed?
Because demand collapses in winter and the fixed costs do not. Smoove grosses $65,000 a month from May to August and $30,000 in the other eight; Sam's goes from $15,000 to $4,000; il Laboratorio's storefront goes from $70,000 to $25,000. The three fixes in this episode are all the same idea — find a buyer who is not a walk-in. Sam works over a hundred street fairs from April to October, Smoove leans on conventions and catering and opened its second shop in California where the weather cooperates year-round, and il Laboratorio sells to restaurants whose desserts sell in January.
Discussion
On paper ice cream is the easiest business in packaged food — frozen, few inputs, proven distribution, zero switching costs. Every conglomerate that owned it has quit. What does the paper version leave out?
No answers yet — be the firstUnilever assembled the largest ice cream business on earth and grew it 4% in twenty years, blaming the weather every one of them. When should an explanation that recurs annually stop being accepted?
No answers yet — be the firstNestlé's margins improved because it cut the pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same, and then it sold the business for $4 billion. What was the buyer purchasing?
No answers yet — be the firstZero switching costs mean a good product can take share in a single trip to the freezer aisle. Why has that not produced a durable winner?
No answers yet — be the firstYou buy one of these brands from a conglomerate that has given up on it. What can you do that they could not?
No answers yet — be the first
Related case studies
Food & beverageWhy bubble tea is so profitableA Sawtelle boba shop grosses $1.08M at a 30% store margin on $9 orders. The moat is the supply chain, not the brand.8 min read
Food & beverageHow much a Texas BBQ joint actually makesOne in three fail, brisket yields 40%, and the biggest variable in whether you survive is one magazine editor's palate.13 min read
Food & beverageWhy your favorite brands got so much worseRecipes got cheaper and portions smaller across American brands at the same moment. Not a coincidence.8 min read