Modern MBA

Case study — Food & beverage · 13 min read · 5 questions

Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore

The thesis

On paper ice cream is the easiest business in packaged food. It is frozen, takes few inputs, scales into enormous quantities, and has decades of proven distribution behind it. Switching costs are zero, so a good product can take share in a single trip to the freezer aisle. It is never a question of whether someone eats ice cream, only when.

And every conglomerate that owned it has quit. Unilever assembled the largest ice cream business on earth and grew it 4% in twenty years, blaming the weather every one of them. Nestlé sold Häagen-Dazs, Dreyer's and Drumstick for $4 billion — after margins that had only improved because it cut the pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same. Kroger owned Turkey Hill for forty years, doing $500 million a year, and sold it for $215 million.

Which makes the private equity money pouring into Van Leeuwen, Jeni's and Salt & Straw hard to explain. These are single-product companies with none of the shared manufacturing or scale that got the conglomerates to double digits — and double digits is the ceiling here, not the target. The three New York independents found the only answers that work: fry it and sell it at street fairs, build a brand the incumbents ignore, or skip consumers entirely and sell to 400 restaurants.

How do you think about this? 5 strategy questions this case raises and does not answer.
Read the comments, or add yours →

The statistics

4% in 20 yearsGrowth of the world's largest ice cream business
16oz → 14ozHäagen-Dazs pint in 2009, at the same price
$500M → $215MTurkey Hill's revenue, and what Kroger sold it for

By the numbers — swipe or use arrows

01The freezer aisle your parents bought fromSales of the top eight ice cream brands in the United States, 2023, in millions. Five of the eight are or were owned by two conglomerates.
The freezer aisle your parents bought from — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$250M$500M$750M$1,000M$951MBen & Jerry's$802MHäagen-Dazs$719MBlue Bell$546MBreyers$546MDreyer's$324MTillamook$248MTurkey Hill$209MTalentiModern MBA
View data
Value
Ben & Jerry's$951M
Häagen-Dazs$802M
Blue Bell$719M
Breyers$546M
Dreyer's$546M
Tillamook$324M
Turkey Hill$248M
Talenti$209M
02It was never a good business on its ownBen & Jerry's operating margin as an independent, through the decade its cultural profile peaked.
It was never a good business on its own — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore−5%0%5%10%7%19919%19929%1993−3%19946%19954%19964%19975%19982%1999Modern MBA
View data
Value
19917%
19929%
19939%
1994−3%
19956%
19964%
19974%
19985%
19992%
03Twenty years, four percentUnilever ice cream division revenue, in millions. The largest ice cream business on earth, in a category everybody buys.
Twenty years, four percent — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$2,500M$5,000M$7,500M$10,000M$8,422M2001$8,127M2002$7,623M2003$7,045M2004$6,947M2005$8,284M2006$8,386M2007$7,194M2020$7,521M2021$8,611M2022$8,611M2023Modern MBA
View data
Value
2001$8,422M
2002$8,127M
2003$7,623M
2004$7,045M
2005$6,947M
2006$8,284M
2007$8,386M
2020$7,194M
2021$7,521M
2022$8,611M
2023$8,611M
04The synergies never arrivedUnilever's ice cream operating margin against the company's overall margin. From 2010 it underperformed nearly every year.
The synergies never arrived — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore0%5%10%15%20%6%7%200115%10%200312%12%200511%13%20078%14%20108%13%20119%14%20138%14%201516%15%201715%16%201911%16%202110%16%2023ICE CREAMWHOLE COMPANYModern MBA
View data
Ice creamWhole company
20016%7%
200315%10%
200512%12%
200711%13%
20108%14%
20118%13%
20139%14%
20158%14%
201716%15%
201915%16%
202111%16%
202310%16%
05The weakest link at UnileverOperating margin of every product division at Unilever, 2020 against 2023. Every euro in ice cream is a euro not in Dove or Knorr.
The weakest link at Unilever — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore0%5%10%15%20%25%5%10%Ice cream19%19%Beauty23%20%Personalcare12%12%Home care16%18%Nutrition20202023Modern MBA
View data
20202023
Ice cream5%10%
Beauty19%19%
Personal care23%20%
Home care12%12%
Nutrition16%18%
06Nestlé ran the same play and got the same answerNestlé ice cream division revenue, in millions. It peaked in 2007 and fell every year after.
Nestlé ran the same play and got the same answer — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$2,500M$5,000M$7,500M$10,000M$4,147M1999$4,416M2001$4,373M2003$8,147M2005$8,724M2007$5,812M2010$5,169M2011$4,776M2013$4,583M2015$3,144M2018$3,289M2019Modern MBA
View data
Value
1999$4,147M
2001$4,416M
2003$4,373M
2005$8,147M
2007$8,724M
2010$5,812M
2011$5,169M
2013$4,776M
2015$4,583M
2018$3,144M
2019$3,289M
07The margin step change is 2009Nestlé ice cream operating margin. The year the Häagen-Dazs pint went from 16 ounces to 14 at the same price.
The margin step change is 2009 — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore0%5%10%15%20%11%199912%200011%200112%200312%200411%200512%200714%201014%201115%201215%2014Modern MBA
View data
Value
199911%
200012%
200111%
200312%
200412%
200511%
200712%
201014%
201114%
201215%
201415%
08What the brands actually change hands forHigh-profile ice cream deals: annual revenue at the time against the price paid. Turkey Hill sold for less than half a year's sales.
What the brands actually change hands for — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$1,000M$2,000M$3,000M$4,000M$5,000M$237M$326MHäagen-Dazs$120M$350MTalenti$500M$215MTurkey Hill$1,800M$4,000MFroneri$100M$222MDippin' DotsREVENUEACQUISITION PRICEModern MBA
View data
RevenueAcquisition price
Häagen-Dazs$237M$326M
Talenti$120M$350M
Turkey Hill$500M$215M
Froneri$1,800M$4,000M
Dippin' Dots$100M$222M
09The pure play grows only by buyingFroneri revenue, in millions. Every increase came from acquisition rather than from volume.
The pure play grows only by buying — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$2,000M$4,000M$6,000M$2,631M2019$3,973M2020$4,240M2021$5,074M2022$5,292M2023Modern MBA
View data
Value
2019$2,631M
2020$3,973M
2021$4,240M
2022$5,074M
2023$5,292M
10Every dollar of profit goes to the lendersFroneri operating income against financing costs and interest payments, in millions. It loses more than it makes, every year.
Every dollar of profit goes to the lenders — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore−$750M−$500M−$250M$0M$250M$500M$750M$214M−$193M2019$276M−$383M2020$233M−$392M2021$413M−$448M2022$530M−$586M2023OPERATING INCOMEFINANCING COSTSModern MBA
View data
Operating incomeFinancing costs
2019$214M−$193M
2020$276M−$383M
2021$233M−$392M
2022$413M−$448M
2023$530M−$586M
11The scoop shops peaked in 2008Cold Stone Creamery locations in the United States. Franchising took it from 225 to 1,375, and it has shrunk ever since.
The scoop shops peaked in 2008 — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore05001,0001,500225200190020051,37520081,30020101,10020111,2532015882202089420218122022Modern MBA
View data
Value
2001225
2005900
20081,375
20101,300
20111,100
20151,253
2020882
2021894
2022812
12You spend a year's revenue to buy a year's revenueCost to open a Cold Stone franchise against annual median revenue by chain, from official franchise disclosure documents.
You spend a year's revenue to buy a year's revenue — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore−$1,000,000−$500,000$0$500,000$1,000,000$1,500,000−$584,000Cost to open$531,000Cold StoneCold Stone$1,386,549Dairy QueenDairy Queen$462,121Baskin RobbinsBaskin Robbins$794,620Handel'sHandel'sModern MBA
View data
Value
Cost to open−$584,000
Cold Stone$531,000
Dairy Queen$1,386,549
Baskin Robbins$462,121
Handel's$794,620
13Eight percent in twelve yearsBaskin Robbins systemwide sales in the United States, in millions. Most of the growth is recovering ground lost in the first five years.
Eight percent in twelve years — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$250M$500M$750M$572M2007$560M2008$530M2009$501M2010$509M2011$528M2012$531M2013$561M2014$595M2015$604M2016$606M2017$612M2018$615M2019Modern MBA
View data
Value
2007$572M
2008$560M
2009$530M
2010$501M
2011$509M
2012$528M
2013$531M
2014$561M
2015$595M
2016$604M
2017$606M
2018$612M
2019$615M
14Even the bright spot is sluggishBaskin Robbins average annual sales per international location. Up 14% across twelve years, and below the 2011 peak.
Even the bright spot is sluggish — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0$100,000$200,000$300,000$400,000$232,4012007$269,8042009$305,0272011$280,7642013$250,7882015$248,6542017$265,5432019Modern MBA
View data
Value
2007$232,401
2009$269,804
2011$305,027
2013$280,764
2015$250,788
2017$248,654
2019$265,543
15And private equity keeps buying in anywayInvestment by private equity and venture capital into emerging ice cream brands, in millions.
And private equity keeps buying in anyway — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0M$10M$20M$30M$25MVan Leeuwen$20MOberweis$19MAmple Hills$15MJeni's$4MSalt & StrawModern MBA
View data
Value
Van Leeuwen$25M
Oberweis$20M
Ample Hills$19M
Jeni's$15M
Salt & Straw$4M
16What three New York independents actually grossAnnual revenue, against the median franchise store. il Laboratorio's number is wholesale plus retail combined.
What three New York independents actually gross — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0$1,000,000$2,000,000$3,000,000$2,780,000il Laboratorio$500,000Smoove$201,000Sam's$531,000Cold Stone$462,121Baskin RobbinsModern MBA
View data
Value
il Laboratorio$2,780,000
Smoove$500,000
Sam's$201,000
Cold Stone$531,000
Baskin Robbins$462,121
17Without the restaurants, it is a small businessSales of il Laboratorio's former Greenwich Village location, now closed, against the other independents and the franchise median.
Without the restaurants, it is a small business — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0$200,000$400,000$600,000$324,000il Laboratorio$500,000Smoove$201,000Sam's$462,121Baskin Robbins$531,000Cold StoneModern MBA
View data
Value
il Laboratorio$324,000
Smoove$500,000
Sam's$201,000
Baskin Robbins$462,121
Cold Stone$531,000
18Every other food concept earns more per dollarAnnual operating margin against big brands and other independent concepts covered on this channel.
Every other food concept earns more per dollar — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore0%10%20%30%40%50%10%il Laboratorio wholesalewholesale9%il Laboratorio retailretail13%Smoove10%Ben & Jerry's10%Häagen-Dazs20%Hey Hey35%Odd One Out30%7 Miles20%Los Gatos Tacos24%Mid East Tacos40%MikikoModern MBA
View data
Value
il Laboratorio wholesale10%
il Laboratorio retail9%
Smoove13%
Ben & Jerry's10%
Häagen-Dazs10%
Hey Hey20%
Odd One Out35%
7 Miles30%
Los Gatos Tacos20%
Mid East Tacos24%
Mikiko40%
19A restaurant is worth forty-five walk-insAverage customer spend, against other concepts covered on this channel. The wholesale figure is monthly; the rest are per visit.
A restaurant is worth forty-five walk-ins — Why nobody wants to own ice cream anymore$0$200$400$600$550il Laboratorio wholesaleil Laboratoriowholesale$12il Laboratorio retailil Laboratorioretail$10Sam'sSam's$10SmooveSmoove$11Hey HeyHey Hey$14Odd One OutOdd One Out$97 Miles7 Miles$13Los Gatos TacosLos Gatos Tacos$15MikikoMikikoModern MBA
View data
Value
il Laboratorio wholesale$550
il Laboratorio retail$12
Sam's$10
Smoove$10
Hey Hey$11
Odd One Out$14
7 Miles$9
Los Gatos Tacos$13
Mikiko$15
01 / 19

Divisional revenue, operating margins and acquisition prices from Unilever, Nestlé, Froneri, Kroger, Dunkin' Brands and Ben & Jerry's annual reports, filings and press releases for the years shown; franchise costs and median unit revenues from Franchise Disclosure Documents; store-level revenue, seasonal splits and operating margins disclosed on camera by the owners of Sam's Fried Ice Cream, Smoove and il Laboratorio del Gelato

Key takeaways

01

Ben & Jerry's was never a good business on its own, which is the part the brand story leaves out. As an independent through the 1990s its operating margin ran 7%, 9%, 9%, 3%, 6%, 4%, 4%, 5% and 2% — through the exact decade its cultural profile peaked. Popularity and profitability were never the same problem.

02

Twenty years later the top line has not moved. $8,422M, $8,127M, $7,623M, $7,045M, $6,947M, $8,284M, $8,386M through 2007, then $7,194M, $7,521M, $8,611M, $8,611M by 2023. Roughly 4% of growth across two decades in a category everybody on earth buys.

03

Set against the other divisions it is not close. In 2023 Unilever ran 10% in ice cream against 19% in beauty, 20% in personal care, 12% in home care and 18% in nutrition — and in 2022 nutrition hit 32% while ice cream managed 10%. Every euro invested in ice cream was a euro not invested in Dove, Axe, Knorr or Hellmann's.

04

Management blamed the weather for twenty years. Weak summers, cold seasons, the rising cost of sugar, dairy and cocoa — every year, the same explanations, on a sample size long enough to rule all of them out. Unilever committed to selling the entire ice cream business by 2025 and has struggled to find a buyer.

05

Its margins did improve — through shrinkflation. Nestlé's ice cream margin ran 11%, 12%, 11%, 12%, 12%, 11%, 12% and then stepped to 14%, 14%, 15%, 15% from 2010. The step change is 2009, the year it cut every Häagen-Dazs pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same price for it.

06

Then it left. In 2019 Nestlé sold the division to Parisian private equity at a 20% premium for $4 billion, citing a desire to focus on high-growth verticals. Owning the second-best-selling ice cream brand in America did not qualify.

07

Kroger had owned Turkey Hill for four decades and it was the seventh best-selling brand in the country. The largest supermarket chain in America, with distribution and shelf space nobody else had, decided the ice cream business was not worth keeping either.

08

The pure-play vehicle was supposed to prove the conglomerates wrong. Froneri does nothing but ice cream and it has grown the top line — $2,631M, $3,973M, $4,240M, $5,074M, $5,292M — entirely through continuous acquisition, with no change in volume.

09

And the debt eats all of it. Froneri's operating income against its financing costs: $214M against $193M, $276M against $383M, $233M against $392M, $413M against $448M, $530M against $586M. It has borrowed so heavily to fund the acquisitions that every dollar of operating profit and more goes to interest. The private equity partner is now looking for its own way out.

10

The franchise disclosures explain why nobody is opening one. It costs $584,000 to open a Cold Stone and the median store grosses $531,000 a year after royalties — against $1,386,549 at Dairy Queen, $794,620 at Handel's and $462,121 at Baskin Robbins. You spend more than a year's revenue to buy a year's revenue.

11

Baskin Robbins only survives by riding another brand. Its owner also owns Dunkin', and bundling the scoop shop into the donut chain is the only way it has held US distribution — 2,763 points in 2007 against 2,524 in 2019. It has fewer American shops now than a decade ago.

12

None of which has stopped private equity. Van Leeuwen has taken $25M, Oberweis $20M, Ample Hills $19M, Jeni's $15M and Salt & Straw $4M to scale production, blanket retailers with pints and open scoop shops — all on the bet that one becomes the Häagen-Dazs of the next generation.

13

The structural problem is that they cannot even reach the ceiling the conglomerates hit. These are single-product businesses with no shared manufacturing, no cross-sell, no distribution leverage and no adjacent categories — the exact things that got Unilever and Nestlé to double digits in the first place. It has happened before: Ample Hills, Milkmade and Phin & Phebes all imploded under outside capital in the 2010s Brooklyn wave.

14

The shop is barely the business. It grosses $15,000 a month in summer and as little as $4,000 in the other three seasons — $81,000 a year against $36,000 of rent. The money is at street fairs: over a hundred of them across the Northeast, 50,000 people a night, ten orders a minute, $2,000 in an evening against $500 on the shop's best day. Fairs bring $120,000 a year, for $201,000 combined.

15

His customers are chefs. He is the exclusive supplier to nearly 400 Manhattan restaurants including Minetta Tavern and Porterhouse, who buy in gallons and turn it into their own desserts sold year-round — which removes the seasonality that defines everybody else in this business. The average wholesale customer spends $550 a month; the average retail customer spends $12 a visit.

16

Which is why the one number that breaks the pattern is a wholesale one. A restaurant spending $550 a month beats a walk-in spending $12 by a factor of forty-five, all year, without a summer. Jon's moat is not a recipe — it is that he does every job himself, keeps inventory in a shorthand only he can read, and offers free delivery, no minimum order and midnight cut-offs that nobody with a normal org chart could match.

Common questions

Why is Unilever selling its ice cream business?

Because it has not grown in twenty years and it drags on the company's margins. Unilever's ice cream division went from roughly €7.6 billion at the start of the 2000s to €7.9 billion in 2023 — about 4% of growth across two decades — while running a 10% operating margin in 2023 against 19% in beauty, 20% in personal care and 18% in nutrition. Management blamed weak summers and the cost of sugar, dairy and cocoa every year for twenty years. It began reporting ice cream as a standalone division specifically to show investors why it wants out, committed to divesting by 2025, and has struggled to find a buyer for the largest ice cream business in the world.

Is an ice cream shop profitable?

Marginally, and only if you solve seasonality. The three New York independents in this episode run 9% to 13% operating margins. Smoove grosses $500,000 a year at 13%, swinging between 10% in winter and 15% in summer. il Laboratorio del Gelato runs 10% on wholesale and 9% on retail. Sam's Fried Ice Cream grosses $81,000 from the shop and $120,000 from street fairs. For comparison, other independent food concepts covered on this channel run 20% to 40%. The franchise route is worse: opening a Cold Stone costs $584,000 and the median store grosses $531,000 a year.

Did Häagen-Dazs shrink its pints?

Yes, in 2009, from 16 ounces to 14 at the same price. It is visible in Nestlé's accounts: the ice cream division's operating margin sat at 11–12% through the 2000s and stepped up to 14–15% from 2010 onwards. Revenue was falling the whole time — from a 2007 peak of $8,724 million down to $3,289 million by 2019 — so the margin improvement came from selling less product for the same money rather than from selling more.

Who owns Ben & Jerry's and Häagen-Dazs?

Unilever bought Ben & Jerry's in 2000 and still owns it, though it has committed to divesting its entire ice cream business. Häagen-Dazs was bought by Nestlé, which sold its ice cream division — Häagen-Dazs, Dreyer's, Drumstick and Dibs — to Froneri, a joint venture with Paris-based private equity, for $4 billion in 2019. Froneri now has that portfolio plus its own acquisitions, tops out at a 10% operating margin, and pays more in interest on its acquisition debt than it earns in operating income.

Why is private equity investing in Van Leeuwen and Jeni's?

On the bet that one becomes the Häagen-Dazs of the next generation. Van Leeuwen has taken $25 million, Oberweis $20 million, Ample Hills $19 million, Jeni's $15 million and Salt & Straw $4 million to scale production, open shops and get pints into retailers. The problem is structural: these are single-product companies with none of the shared manufacturing, unified distribution, cross-sell or adjacent categories that got Unilever and Nestlé to double-digit margins — and double digits is the ceiling in this category, not the target. It has failed before: Ample Hills, Milkmade and Phin & Phebes all imploded under outside capital in the 2010s.

Why did Kroger sell Turkey Hill?

For the same reason as everyone else — it decided the category was not worth the shelf it occupied. Kroger had owned Turkey Hill for four decades, it was the seventh best-selling ice cream brand in the United States, and it grossed $500 million a year. Kroger sold it to private equity in 2019 for $215 million, less than half its annual revenue. When the largest supermarket chain in America cannot make ice cream worth owning, the distribution advantage everyone assumes exists is not there.

How does il Laboratorio del Gelato make money?

By skipping consumers. Jon is the exclusive supplier to nearly 400 Manhattan restaurants, who buy in gallons and turn the gelato into their own desserts sold all year — which removes the seasonality that defines the rest of the industry. Wholesale grosses $190,000 a month, $2.3 million a year, against $480,000 from the storefront. The average wholesale customer spends $550 a month; the average retail customer spends $12 a visit. He tested a retail-only second location and closed it after it grossed $324,000 a year, and he refuses supermarkets and licensing entirely because he cannot control the freezer temperature once the product leaves his hands.

Why is ice cream so seasonal, and can that be fixed?

Because demand collapses in winter and the fixed costs do not. Smoove grosses $65,000 a month from May to August and $30,000 in the other eight; Sam's goes from $15,000 to $4,000; il Laboratorio's storefront goes from $70,000 to $25,000. The three fixes in this episode are all the same idea — find a buyer who is not a walk-in. Sam works over a hundred street fairs from April to October, Smoove leans on conventions and catering and opened its second shop in California where the weather cooperates year-round, and il Laboratorio sells to restaurants whose desserts sell in January.

Discussion

  1. On paper ice cream is the easiest business in packaged food — frozen, few inputs, proven distribution, zero switching costs. Every conglomerate that owned it has quit. What does the paper version leave out?

  2. Unilever assembled the largest ice cream business on earth and grew it 4% in twenty years, blaming the weather every one of them. When should an explanation that recurs annually stop being accepted?

  3. Nestlé's margins improved because it cut the pint from 16 ounces to 14 and charged the same, and then it sold the business for $4 billion. What was the buyer purchasing?

  4. Zero switching costs mean a good product can take share in a single trip to the freezer aisle. Why has that not produced a durable winner?

  5. You buy one of these brands from a conglomerate that has given up on it. What can you do that they could not?

Related case studies